SUSAN D. BLUM
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Selected Publications
  • Good Learning
  • Events
  • Media

A Tale of Two A's

6/26/2012

0 Comments

 
Joey and Katie both got A’s in their classes. Joey read about 30 pages, and Katie read about 3,000. Joey took 15 quizzes and a final exam, and wrote a four-page paper. Katie wrote 15 weekly position papers and four more substantial papers, each with two drafts that received comments from both the professor and fellow students, and ended with a 15-page research project. Joey enjoyed the class and learned some important things about how to analyze the role of sport in society. Katie’s life was transformed by the class. Both learned, both succeeded, but there were some substantial differences.
Dedicated to my earnest dean, John McGreevy


Joey took “Introduction to Sport” for a lot of reasons. It was on the list of suggested courses. It fit into his schedule. The professor, Dr. Nicely, was famous for being interesting, great to students, and easy. His friend Rocko had taken it last year and swore up and down that he’d only had to go to class about five times all semester and got an A. What could be bad?

            Joey showed up. This prof was pretty cool. He showed videos of athletes and explained which ones were being exploited and which ones were using the system (not too many). He obviously loved teaching, and the hour went by pretty fast. The kids in the back of the room spent most of the time on Facebook and YouTube or texting about their afternoon plans, and some slept. What could you expect, in such a dark room? Who could stay awake?

            The quizzes were online. Joey took the first one and bombed, but he took it again and did better. Janie J was next door and offered to take it for Joey. Janie J—that’s what they called her—was really smart, and had taken “Introduction to Sport” last year. She loved helping out the guys. Without even concentrating, she got all the questions right.

            This was going to be a sweet semester. When he didn’t have too bad a morning, Joey could go listen to this entertaining guy talk about his favorite subject in the world, and it was usually fascinating. When he had had a rough night, he could just sleep in. He might try to do his own quizzes, but there was always the insurance policy of Janie J who could help him out. What’s not to like?

*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *

Katie couldn’t sleep. Her mind was filled with words like socioeconomic stratification and dependency and postcolonialism. For a girl from Kansas, this was heady stuff. Last year she took classes that were a lot like high school—chemistry, Spanish—but this year she was discovering that there were invisible forces operating all around her and that it was not just an accident (or a result of hard work) that her family had four shiny cars and two houses, while some poor kid in Haiti was barefoot and chronically ill. She was worried about how she would talk to her mother when Mom raised the question of a vacation in the Bahamas. Katie was considering going to help build a school in Haiti instead, but it would ruin Mom’s plans.

Besides, Katie was in love. She had fallen in love with the idea of writing passionate position papers that built on strong statements from these amazing books she’d been reading. Her role model, Dr. Justice, never seemed to waste a second of her time. She seemed to have read everything in the world and knew it all without having to look it up. Katie didn’t call it a “crush,” but she knew that she wanted to be more like Dr. Justice than like Mom. Even the really hard reading was worthwhile and she did all of it, because in class she never knew which would come up in the discussion.

Dr. Justice had read her first paper and given her comments, then met with her and showed her how to revise it. After three of these short papers, Katie thought she was getting the hang of this kind of writing and actually liked it. She loved going to “Introduction to Development Theory.” The time flew by, and the eighteen students all seemed to care about what they were learning. She had never had an experience like this before. In high school all the goody-goody students cared about was brown-nosing and getting A’s. In all her other classes, everyone seemed to do as little as possible. But in Dr. Justice’s class people even read extra things. It felt important, like it could make a difference in the world. And for the first time in her life, Katie not only wanted to make things better but thought she might be figuring out how this could happen.

Joey and Katie both got A’s in their classes. Joey read about 30 pages, and Katie read about 3,000. Joey took 15 quizzes and a final exam, and wrote a four-page paper. Katie wrote 15 weekly position papers and four more substantial papers, each with two drafts that received comments from both the professor and fellow students, and ended with a 15-page research project. Joey enjoyed the class and learned some important things about how to analyze the role of sport in society. Katie’s life was transformed by the class. Both learned, both succeeded, but there were some substantial differences.

            What role did grades play in their class experience? Did grades motivate these students? Did they encourage cheating? Hard work? And what does the trace of that experience in the black-and-white letter on the transcript tell us? Is one A deserved and one a sham? Should we urge all professors to “give” fewer A’s? In Dr. Nicely’s case, we certainly could make that case. What about the professors like Dr. Justice who inspire all their students to do great work, and then help them attain the skills needed to do it?

            These are not easy questions, and they go to the heart of what we—students, faculty, administrators—are attempting to do in higher education. We have to answer that fundamental question before we focus on the bald outcome.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2021
    March 2021
    August 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    6-4
    Academic Freedom
    Adhd
    Affect
    Agency
    Anthropology
    Anthropology Of Education
    Anti-intellectualism
    Arne Duncan
    Art
    Assessment
    Atlanta Teaching Scandal
    Attention
    Authentic Assessment
    Authenticity
    Authorship
    Badges
    Banking Model
    Barack Obama Election
    Bilingualism
    Blum
    Catfish
    Censorship
    Cheating
    Chen Guangchen
    Childhood
    China
    China Bashing
    College
    College Admissions
    College Football
    Commencement
    Communication
    Competition
    Confucius Institutes
    Con Games
    Corruption
    Cost Of College
    Costs Of College
    Covid-19
    Creativity
    Credentials
    Credits
    Critical Anthropology Of Education
    Cs Peirce
    Cultural Literacy
    Culture Of College
    Culture Of Poverty
    Curiosity
    Deception
    Decline In Reading
    Deep Learning
    Delayed Gratification
    Design Thinking
    Education
    Engagement
    Equality
    Ethics
    Evolution
    Exchange Value
    Executive Function
    Extrinsic Motivation
    Families
    Feminist Pedagogy
    Football
    Freedom
    Friday Classes
    Game Of School
    Gaming
    Gaokao
    Garden
    Gender
    Gender Ratio
    Goals Of College
    Goals Of Education
    Grades
    Grading
    Graduation
    Higher Education
    High School
    High Stakes Testing
    High-stakes Testing
    Homeschooling
    Hong Kong
    Honor Codes
    Human Nature
    Humor
    Inequality
    Intellectual Property
    Intelligence
    Intrinsic Motivation
    Jacques Dubochet
    Joshua Wong Hong Kong
    June 4
    June Fourth
    Language
    Language Gap
    Learning
    Linguistic Anthropology
    Literacy
    Literature
    Lying
    Malala
    Marx
    Meaning
    Medicalization
    Mental Illness
    Meritocracy
    Metaphor
    Money
    Mooc
    Moocs
    Morality
    Motivation
    Mo Yan
    Multilingualism
    Multimodality
    Music
    Neurobiology
    New Media
    New Year Resolutions
    Nobel Peace Prize
    Nobel Prize
    No Child Left Behind
    Notre Dame
    Nyu
    Occupy
    Pandemic Pedagogy
    Paolo Freire
    Pedagogy
    Permaculture
    Plagiarism
    Play
    Pleasure
    Politics
    Praise
    Procrastination
    Questions
    Race To The Top
    Rand Paul
    Reading
    Reading Habits
    Return On Investment
    Sat Test
    School
    Schooling
    Self-censorship
    Semiotics
    Sign
    Sociality
    Socialization
    Soft Power
    Steven Mosher
    Student Centered Learning
    Student-centered Learning
    Student Revolutions
    Students
    Supersign
    Symbol
    Teaching
    Technophilia
    Technophobia
    Teenagers
    Term Paper Mills
    Testing
    Tiananmen
    Transcript
    Truth
    Unessay
    Ungrading
    Unschooling
    Use Value
    Verbal Play
    Wellbeing
    Wicked Problems
    William Ayers
    Writing
    Youth

    RSS Feed

​SusanBlum.com by Susan D. Blum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Selected Publications
  • Good Learning
  • Events
  • Media