SUSAN D. BLUM
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Selected Publications
  • Good Learning
  • Events
  • Media

College for All? Why That Doesn't Make Us All Equal

5/30/2016

1 Comment

 
For perfectly well-intentioned reasons, many people advocate “college for all.” But going to college, as Bryan Caplan puts it, “is a lot like standing up at a concert to see better. Selfishly speaking, it works, but from a social point of view, we shouldn’t encourage it.”
For perfectly well-intentioned reasons, many people advocate “college for all.” But going to college, as Bryan Caplan puts it, “is a lot like standing up at a concert to see better. Selfishly speaking, it works, but from a social point of view, we shouldn’t encourage it.”

In this political season, promises of free college tuition for all sounds really great. Student debt is a terrible burden. But free college isn’t going to make everyone equal. There will still be Princetons and CUNYs, Oberlins and Arizona States.

College for All?

Promoting “college for all” as a way to increase equality is a complicated, confusing, and ultimately illogical means to a worthy end.  As David Labaree points out, with competitive schooling as we have it, “someone has to fail.”

Even if every individual attended college, not every individual would become “successful,” just as not all individuals will be above average. Nor will sending every individual to college eradicate poverty or inequality. The “haves” will still have more.
 
Even if everyone had a four-year degree, there would not be jobs for all graduates, at least not jobs requiring the content of those educations—unless we address jobs directly.
 
So if the goal of college is full employment or inequality eradication, this goal will not be met. In John Marsh’s book Class Dismissed: Why We Cannot Teach or Learn Our Way Out of Inequality, he explains why “college for all” is bound to be unsuccessful—at least at the level of an entire society.  (For individuals it may be different.) The reason has mainly to do with getting the argument backward: first we need to address poverty. Education may follow.
 
In fall 2012 the New York Times hosted a debate: Should everyone go to college, or is college a waste of time?  (The Chronicle of Higher Education had a similar forum in 2009; one commenter noted that if even the Chronicle of Higher Education was questioning this, we are far down the road of doubt.)
 
The question is usually framed as: Is college worth the (economic) investment? Economists give competing answers, though the general belief is that despite the expense and forgone wages, the lifetime earnings of college graduates are much higher than those of high school graduates: the “college premium.” An allied inquiry asks which schools and which majors provide the highest “return on investment.”
 
But, say the old elite, such as the Phi Beta Kappa society (full disclosure: I’m a member), college is not simply about getting a job. The model of a liberal arts education, with a luxurious curriculum that establishes a floor for what young students may need to know in the future, hangs on in some colleges and universities: Great Books, Kant, postcolonialism, critical thinking, the basics of relativity theory, and so on.
 
In community colleges and in the increasingly popular vocational training for business, engineering, information technology, medical professions, education, and the like, there is no time for Kant when examinations have to be passed and bills have to be paid. (There are those “gen eds,” but even here probably not too much Kant.) Getting the credential as quickly and cheaply as possible is the primary goal.
 
At a farm-to-table dinner in Chautauqua, New York, I met a young woman who worked in recruiting at a nearby community college. Though she herself had a four-year degree, she was passionate about the “value” provided by the community college. “Why would you pay so much more for the basic classes in a four-year school,” she asked, “when you could do it comfortably at the local community college, and live at home?”
 
In summer 2014 Starbucks partnered with Arizona State University to offer some employees compensation for enrolling in ASU’s online courses.
 
But who is enrolling in these courses? Is it the children of the elite?
 
The costs are real. Individuals, right now, don’t have time to wait for the revolution.
 
One of the ideas from the 2011 Occupy movement that caught on easily (and led to an offshoot, Occupy Student Debt) had to do with _college debt, now staggering, and filled with treacherous traps for a lifetime.  Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, and many others have attempted to get at this problem from the side of banks and the government, limiting the amount students are obligated to repay.
 
From the economic point of view, with the issue of cost front and center, suggestions have included designing cheap degrees, paying for college for promising students, or skipping college entirely. For an individual, it is statistically advantageous to go to college, and preferably complete it, though the likelihood of (1) enrolling, (2) succeeding, and (3) finishing a degree, especially a four-year degree, is low for disadvantaged youth, first-generation college students, and minorities. . Not only that, but they often end up financially worse off than they were when they began.
 
In a system where the college degree signals a certain kind of commitment and the character that accompanies it, anyone without a degree will be seen as falling short—unless she can signal this information in some other form.
 
Those already solidly in the middle class, with all the cultural and social capital they need, already knowing “how to learn” and reading at a high level, confident about their abilities, able to make calls to top executives, can take PayPal investor Peter Thiel up on his offer of $50,000 for two years to carry out an entrepreneurial objective as long as they do not go to college; or they can get connected with “UnCollege,” pay $31,000, and be led on a yearlong self-creation journey after high school.
 
In the increasingly unequal United States, those who already have evidence of their virtue can forgo proving it through the college degree and can concentrate on the substance of what they are learning, whether in or out of school. Those desperate to confirm their abilities have no option other than sitting in classrooms for as long as it takes.
 
Yes, the substance of college can be transformative. It can be the pivotal moment in a young life. It can be a needed and substantive step to a complex career. It can change lives. Or it can be an empty but costly slog through dreaded, meaningless requirements.
 
But if it is merely for a credential, then let us please stop.
 
And if everyone pursues the same credential, but the credential is mainly used to sort everyone, then this credential will not be enough, and some will have better credentials, more credentials, or more of something.
 
Dreams are great. Big dreams are terrific. But misleading dreams are dangerous.

 _ _ _ _ 

This is excerpted from Chapter 11, "Both Sides Now of a Learning Revolution," of Susan D. Blum, "I Love Learning; I Hate School": An Anthropology of College (Cornell University Press, 2016). 

1 Comment
kodi.software link
3/3/2022 06:50:31 am

nks for sharing the article, and more importantly, your personal experie sdcnce mindfully using our emotions as data about our inner state and knowing when it’sdcsdc s better to de-escalate by taking a time out are great tools. Appreciate you reading and sharing your story since I can certainly relate and I think others can to

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2021
    March 2021
    August 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    6-4
    Academic Freedom
    Adhd
    Affect
    Agency
    Anthropology
    Anthropology Of Education
    Anti-intellectualism
    Arne Duncan
    Art
    Assessment
    Atlanta Teaching Scandal
    Attention
    Authentic Assessment
    Authenticity
    Authorship
    Badges
    Banking Model
    Barack Obama Election
    Bilingualism
    Blum
    Catfish
    Censorship
    Cheating
    Chen Guangchen
    Childhood
    China
    China Bashing
    College
    College Admissions
    College Football
    Commencement
    Communication
    Competition
    Confucius Institutes
    Con Games
    Corruption
    Cost Of College
    Costs Of College
    Covid-19
    Creativity
    Credentials
    Credits
    Critical Anthropology Of Education
    Cs Peirce
    Cultural Literacy
    Culture Of College
    Culture Of Poverty
    Curiosity
    Deception
    Decline In Reading
    Deep Learning
    Delayed Gratification
    Design Thinking
    Education
    Engagement
    Equality
    Ethics
    Evolution
    Exchange Value
    Executive Function
    Extrinsic Motivation
    Families
    Feminist Pedagogy
    Football
    Freedom
    Friday Classes
    Game Of School
    Gaming
    Gaokao
    Garden
    Gender
    Gender Ratio
    Goals Of College
    Goals Of Education
    Grades
    Grading
    Graduation
    Higher Education
    High School
    High Stakes Testing
    High-stakes Testing
    Homeschooling
    Hong Kong
    Honor Codes
    Human Nature
    Humor
    Inequality
    Intellectual Property
    Intelligence
    Intrinsic Motivation
    Jacques Dubochet
    Joshua Wong Hong Kong
    June 4
    June Fourth
    Language
    Language Gap
    Learning
    Linguistic Anthropology
    Literacy
    Literature
    Lying
    Malala
    Marx
    Meaning
    Medicalization
    Mental Illness
    Meritocracy
    Metaphor
    Money
    Mooc
    Moocs
    Morality
    Motivation
    Mo Yan
    Multilingualism
    Multimodality
    Music
    Neurobiology
    New Media
    New Year Resolutions
    Nobel Peace Prize
    Nobel Prize
    No Child Left Behind
    Notre Dame
    Nyu
    Occupy
    Pandemic Pedagogy
    Paolo Freire
    Pedagogy
    Permaculture
    Plagiarism
    Play
    Pleasure
    Politics
    Praise
    Procrastination
    Questions
    Race To The Top
    Rand Paul
    Reading
    Reading Habits
    Return On Investment
    Sat Test
    School
    Schooling
    Self-censorship
    Semiotics
    Sign
    Sociality
    Socialization
    Soft Power
    Steven Mosher
    Student Centered Learning
    Student-centered Learning
    Student Revolutions
    Students
    Supersign
    Symbol
    Teaching
    Technophilia
    Technophobia
    Teenagers
    Term Paper Mills
    Testing
    Tiananmen
    Transcript
    Truth
    Unessay
    Ungrading
    Unschooling
    Use Value
    Verbal Play
    Wellbeing
    Wicked Problems
    William Ayers
    Writing
    Youth

    RSS Feed

​SusanBlum.com by Susan D. Blum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Selected Publications
  • Good Learning
  • Events
  • Media