SUSAN D. BLUM
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Selected Publications
  • Good Learning
  • Events
  • Media

How Equal Are We Anyway? Different Illusions of Meritocracy in Chinese and United States Schooling

11/25/2012

1 Comment

 
Claims have been made recently that China is a meritocracy, not a democracy, because its leaders have risen through examinations and testing.

But like in the US, where SAT and college admission to elite universities tracks almost completely with socioeconomic status, in China the well-off have the means to pay the bribes that ensure school success all along the way.

(Also on Huffington Post)
Can you believe that Chinese parents bribe teachers to grade their children’s homework?

Why not? American parents also give their children every advantage they can afford, from donations to private schools to test preparation and college counselors. It just goes beyond our imagination in China.

Claims have been made recently that China is a meritocracy, not a democracy, because its leaders have risen through examinations and testing.

A pointed debate on this has arisen, but it is one that has existed in China for more than a millennium: How should “the best” leaders be identified? Some claim that because of its 1400-year tradition of a civil service examination, China is a meritocracy.

What is a “meritocracy,” anyway? What is “merit”?

Wouldn’t it be ideal for a country to identify “the best” individuals, regardless of circumstance, and prepare them for leadership?

That is part of the original idea—one of the ideas, anyway—behind the SAT®, once called the Scholastic Aptitude Test. One would get “aptitude” rather than learning, on the assumption that the test would measure the stable core of “intelligence” rather than what a person has had the opportunity to learn because of family background. The College Board™, which runs the SAT, has given up the ruse that it assesses “aptitude,” instead using only the abbreviation; decades of showing improvement through coaching has disabused all of us of the pretense that something innate is measurable. (The whole idea of “intelligence” as a single concept, testable and stable, has also long been exploded. Howard Gardner is one of the important figures in this field.)

But seeking able leaders is a worldwide, perennial task. It can be done by lineage (hereditary monarchies), by tests of ability (pulling swords from stones), or by other means. In the United States we are fascinated by the story of Abraham Lincoln pulling himself up by his back-country bootstraps.

In a New York Times editorial, Chinese scholar Zhang Weiwei, professor at Fudan University, defended the Chinese political system in part because of the long history of the Keju, examination, system. Canadian scholar Daniel Bell, sometimes called an “apologist” for the Chinese system, promotes it as well.

This system in principle identified “the most meritorious” men who could become officials. Most, of course, came from backgrounds that were already privileged but Chinese folklore is filled with tales of poor young men who received an education, supported by their entire clan, and became scholar-officials. (The Chinese system in general regards success as a result of effort, not innate ability.)

But like in the US, where SAT and college admission to elite universities tracks almost completely with socioeconomic status, in China the well-off have the means to pay the bribes that ensure school success all along the way. In contemporary times, the ultimate test, the gaokao, is somewhat less susceptible to corruption than its predecessor, and efforts to keep it untainted are enormous, but all the steps along the way, from kindergarten admission to location of students’ seats, from after-school tutoring to high school abroad, can be smoothed with enough money.

As Dan Levin reported in the New York Times on November 22, “the going bribery rate for admission to a high school linked to the renowned Renmin University in Beijing is $80,000 to $130,000.”

Lest readers feel too smug, reflect on the fact that tuition at the University of Chicago Laboratory School is $26,520 for high school during 2012-2013. This extraordinary educational institution prepares its students for a lifetime of success. So when those students succeed, is it because of merit?

 I have many reservations about what schools teach and the inadvertent lessons learned (about competition, zero-sum games, passivity, a divided self, and more) but if years of schooling may lead to improved life chances for individuals (albeit credential inflation for the society as a whole), then one positive aspect of the US educational system is its offering of second chances, in the form of community colleges and their “developmental” courses, remediating what was not learned at earlier levels of schooling.

In the United States we have vacillated between believing that some individuals are more “gifted” than others and that everyone should have equal chances. We alternate between tracking and mainstreaming, between testing of “intelligence” and testing of “value-added.” We have had academic versus vocational schooling, and then to ensure equal chances all around, have made all schooling academic, just in case every student wants to go to college.

Currently in the United States we are reinstating a kind of vocational (“work”) preparation. China has that too, and students who finish with vocational degrees often earn higher salaries than students attending academic programs, but the prestige is much lower, so many parents invest life savings in academic educations.

But what of the parents who can’t?

Like in the US, China now has student loans, so, like us, college graduates can have enormous debt burdens.

The children of the privileged can sail off into lives made smooth by their families, always scoring highest, getting into the best programs, and ultimately finding their way to the top leadership of the nation.

Sound familiar?

The days of Abraham Lincoln have passed. Instead we have Romneys with their generations of wealth. But at least we comfort ourselves with stories about equal opportunity. And we have an ideology of equality. As long as we don’t fool ourselves into confusing ideals and reality, such ideals can be the standard to which we hold ourselves.

At least we can look at China and see how bad this system of educational corruption could become.

1 Comment
fitness health pros link
8/1/2013 10:26:26 pm

Learning is always better than schooling. Most people believe that education is about scoring high marks at the exams and getting a job. We need to change this attitude. Education is about the overall improvement of a human being.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2021
    March 2021
    August 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    6-4
    Academic Freedom
    Adhd
    Affect
    Agency
    Anthropology
    Anthropology Of Education
    Anti-intellectualism
    Arne Duncan
    Art
    Assessment
    Atlanta Teaching Scandal
    Attention
    Authentic Assessment
    Authenticity
    Authorship
    Badges
    Banking Model
    Barack Obama Election
    Bilingualism
    Blum
    Catfish
    Censorship
    Cheating
    Chen Guangchen
    Childhood
    China
    China Bashing
    College
    College Admissions
    College Football
    Commencement
    Communication
    Competition
    Confucius Institutes
    Con Games
    Corruption
    Cost Of College
    Costs Of College
    Covid-19
    Creativity
    Credentials
    Credits
    Critical Anthropology Of Education
    Cs Peirce
    Cultural Literacy
    Culture Of College
    Culture Of Poverty
    Curiosity
    Deception
    Decline In Reading
    Deep Learning
    Delayed Gratification
    Design Thinking
    Education
    Engagement
    Equality
    Ethics
    Evolution
    Exchange Value
    Executive Function
    Extrinsic Motivation
    Families
    Feminist Pedagogy
    Football
    Freedom
    Friday Classes
    Game Of School
    Gaming
    Gaokao
    Garden
    Gender
    Gender Ratio
    Goals Of College
    Goals Of Education
    Grades
    Grading
    Graduation
    Higher Education
    High School
    High Stakes Testing
    High-stakes Testing
    Homeschooling
    Hong Kong
    Honor Codes
    Human Nature
    Humor
    Inequality
    Intellectual Property
    Intelligence
    Intrinsic Motivation
    Jacques Dubochet
    Joshua Wong Hong Kong
    June 4
    June Fourth
    Language
    Language Gap
    Learning
    Linguistic Anthropology
    Literacy
    Literature
    Lying
    Malala
    Marx
    Meaning
    Medicalization
    Mental Illness
    Meritocracy
    Metaphor
    Money
    Mooc
    Moocs
    Morality
    Motivation
    Mo Yan
    Multilingualism
    Multimodality
    Music
    Neurobiology
    New Media
    New Year Resolutions
    Nobel Peace Prize
    Nobel Prize
    No Child Left Behind
    Notre Dame
    Nyu
    Occupy
    Pandemic Pedagogy
    Paolo Freire
    Pedagogy
    Permaculture
    Plagiarism
    Play
    Pleasure
    Politics
    Praise
    Procrastination
    Questions
    Race To The Top
    Rand Paul
    Reading
    Reading Habits
    Return On Investment
    Sat Test
    School
    Schooling
    Self-censorship
    Semiotics
    Sign
    Sociality
    Socialization
    Soft Power
    Steven Mosher
    Student Centered Learning
    Student-centered Learning
    Student Revolutions
    Students
    Supersign
    Symbol
    Teaching
    Technophilia
    Technophobia
    Teenagers
    Term Paper Mills
    Testing
    Tiananmen
    Transcript
    Truth
    Unessay
    Ungrading
    Unschooling
    Use Value
    Verbal Play
    Wellbeing
    Wicked Problems
    William Ayers
    Writing
    Youth

    RSS Feed

​SusanBlum.com by Susan D. Blum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Selected Publications
  • Good Learning
  • Events
  • Media